An Obama Presidency; Hero or Pied Piper?
By Tony Medley
As a Reagan Independent, I
view the election of Barack Obama as a possible breath of fresh air for
the serious problems that permeate the family life of America's blacks.
Ronald Reagan, who is the only political hero of my lifetime, opened up
Washington to a non-political way of getting things accomplished. He
wasn’t a Washington politician and he had a core set of values. The
results? Ending the Cold War without a shot and reinvigorating an
economy that Jimmy Carter had eviscerated and left for dead.
Unfortunately, Reagan’s legacy was devastated by George Herbert Walker
Bush, whose first act as President was to purge all Reaganites from his
Administration.
Barack Obama stands on the
threshold of history. He is articulate, the most inspirational speaker
to become President since JFK. Nobody knows what his core values are.
It’s possible that all the leftwing stuff that has been attributed to
him constitute just a Machiavellian way to achieve power. Regardless, he
can truly make a difference in one of the most troubling aspects of
American society. During the campaign, he made a statement that blacks
have to be responsible. While it’s difficult to pin Obama down at this
stage of his career, this seems to align him with Bill Cosby, Thomas
Sowell, Ward Connerly, and Shelby Steele, who argue that blacks have to
be responsible for their lives and not depend on government largesse. To
date, they have been voices crying in the wilderness, drowned out by
demagogues like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, who have subverted the
Civil Rights Movement, converting it into an industry of whine for their
livelihoods, indeed for their raison d’ętre.
If there are civilian
heroes in our society today it is the black women, impregnated and
abandoned by irresponsible males, who birth their children, raise them,
and support them alone with little or no help from the men who
impregnated them. These are mothers to be loved, but their babies grow
up fatherless. This is one of the primary basic problems with black
society that Cosby, Sowell, Connerly, and Steele constantly address, but
which Jackson and Sharpton and their cohorts ignore.
Obama flung down his
gauntlet on July 14, 2008 in a speech to the 99th Annual
Convention of the NAACP on the need for black fathers to take
responsibility for the children they sire. Here’s what he said:
I know that
Thurgood Marshall did not argue Brown versus Board of Education so that
some of us could stop doing our jobs as parents. And I know that nine
little children did not walk through a schoolhouse door in Little Rock
so that we could stand by and let our children drop out of school and
turn to gangs for the support they are not getting elsewhere. That's not
the freedom they fought so hard to achieve. That's not the America they
gave so much to build. That's not the dream they had for our children.
That's why if we're
serious about reclaiming that dream, we have to do more in our own
lives, our own families, and our own communities. That starts with
providing the guidance our children need, turning off the TV, and
putting away the video games; attending those parent-teacher
conferences, helping our children with their homework, and setting a
good example. It starts with teaching our daughters to never allow
images on television to tell them what they are worth; and teaching our
sons to treat women with respect, and to realize that responsibility
does not end at conception; that what makes them men is not the ability
to have a child but the courage to raise one. It starts by being good
neighbors and good citizens who are willing to volunteer in our
communities - and to help our synagogues and churches and community
centers feed the hungry and care for the elderly. We all have to do our
part to lift up this country.
That's where change
begins. And that, after all, is the true genius of America - not that
America is, but that America will be; not that we are perfect, but that
we can make ourselves more perfect; that brick by brick, calloused hand
by calloused hand, people who love this country can change it. And
that's our most enduring responsibility - the responsibility to future
generations. We have to change this country for them. We have to leave
them a planet that's cleaner, a nation that's safer, and a world that's
more equal and more just.
This is exactly what Cosby,
Sowell, Connerly, and Steele have been saying for years. Jesse Jackson,
however, was enraged, calling it "Talking down to black people,” while
suggesting that Obama needed an operation on his genitals. As Steele
commented, “Normally, ‘black responsibility’ is a forbidden phrase for a
black leader -- not because blacks reject responsibility, but because
even the idea of black responsibility weakens moral leverage over
whites. When Mr. Obama uses this language, whites of course are
thankful. Black leaders seethe.”
Steele continues,
“Thomas Sowell, among many others, has articulated the power of
individual responsibility as
an antidote to black poverty for over 40 years. Black thinkers as far
back as Frederick Douglas and Booker T. Washington have done the same.
Why then, all of a sudden, are blacks willing to openly embrace this
truth -- and in the full knowledge that it will weaken their leverage
with whites?
“I
think the answer is that Mr. Obama potentially offers them something far
more profound than mere moral leverage. If only symbolically, he offers
nothing less than an end to black inferiority. This has been an
insidious spiritual torment for blacks because reality itself keeps
mockingly proving the original lie. Barack Obama in the Oval Office -- a
black man governing a largely white nation -- would offer blacks an
undreamed-of spiritual solace far more meaningful than the petty
self-importance to be gained from moral leverage.
“But white Americans have also been tormented by their stigmatization as
moral inferiors, as racists. An Obama presidency would give them
considerable moral leverage against this stigma.”
Obama can redirect the
ambitions of blacks. He can rescue the Civil Rights movement for blacks
and put it back on the track that Martin Luther King intended when he
said he dreamed of an America that judged people by the content of their
character rather than the color of their skin. He can stop referring to
blacks as “African Americans,” and accept that they are Americans, pure
and simple. He stands as a primary example of someone who didn’t depend
on government handouts and charity to get ahead. He came from nowhere to
be elected President of the United States and the fact that his skin was
black was no impediment.
I hope that his speech
before the NAACP was more than just rhetoric, and I have to believe that
it was, because that wasn’t the place where such language could be
conceived as popular. I have to believe that Obama really meant what he
said. If he did, he could be leading the nation into a bright new future
of racial harmony. However, the proof is in the pudding. Obama has said
he's a healor and wants to reach out. If he reaches out to Messrs.
Cosby, Sowell, Connerly, and Steele we'll know he's an honest man who
means what he says. If not, then he it will be more proof that he's the
pied piper of Hamelin, and that will be more than just sad for our
country.
November 9, 2008 |