Sports Medley:
Women’s Olympics Ice Hockey Team Outshines NBC’s Dismal Coverage 26 Feb
18
by Tony Medley
My interest in the
Olympics has waned geometrically since NBC took over the telecasts from
ABC. ABC’s Olympic coverage remains the gold standard. When NBC took
over, live coverage ended. It also marked the start of NBC thumbing its
nose at Track and Field. For instance, ABC would show each high jumper
each time he or she jumped. NBC just shows, basically two or three final
jumps, including the winning jump. Most other field events are covered
with the same disdain.
But what really
galled me was NBC’s coverage of women’s softball (which has been banned
from the Olympics, although it might return). Women’s softball was my
favorite Olympics sport. There are many reasons. One is that they play
the game for the love of it; there is no pot of gold at the end of this
rainbow for these players. The second is that they are technically
sound. They play the game much more fundamentally correct than major
leaguers, who generally just mail it in (just watch Yasmani Grandal play
catcher for the Dodgers). The US dominated, but NBC usually played their
games at 3 AM, ensuring that virtually nobody would see them.
That said, I find the
Winter Olympics terminally uninvolving. Does anybody really care about
sitting for hours watching curling? Bobsled? Luge? Cross-country skiing?
Biathlon? Skeleton? I could go on and on and list virtually every
“sport” involved in the Winter Olympics. The only events in which I’m
interested are women’s figure skating and downhill skiing.
Even so, the women’s
gold medal hockey game against Canada was one of the most exciting
sporting events I’ve seen this century. Naturally NBC gave it the back
of its hand, and only showed the end of the third period, the overtime,
and the shoot-out. (NBC’s ratings were justifiably down approximately
16-17% over four years ago).
But, like women’s
softball, these women play the game much better than their male
counterparts, including those who play in the NHL. Their passing is
crisper and far more accurate; their stick handling is better. Their
enthusiasm and dedication to the game is akin to that shown by those who
play women’s softball. And they don’t emulate the brutality of the men’s
game that has been described as going to see a fight and a hockey game
broke out.
One will rarely see a
more outstanding example of stick handling than that shown by
Jocelyn Lamoureux in
scoring the winning goal. It was a shot that should go down in the
history of hockey, regardless of the sex playing.
What are the
Dodgers thinking?
Of course, that is assuming facts not in evidence. Infielder Charlie
Culbertson was their best player in the postseason in 2017. Culbertson
batted .455 in five playoff games against the Cubs, .600 in the World
Series (3 for 5). In contrast, starting shortstop Corey Seager got only
3 more hits in 22 more at bats, going 6 for 27 against Houston. In
addition, Culbertson played the best defensive shortstop I’ve ever seen
played by a Dodger and I’ve been watching them for more than 60 years.
So what do they do?
They trade Culbertson for the equivalent of a couple of batting practice
baseballs but re-sign infielder Chase Utley to a 2 year, $2 million
contract.
Utley batted .000 in
15 at bats in the postseason last year and is 39 years old. Culbertson
was paid $550,000 last year, is 11 years younger, hit the
Division-clinching home run in 2016, and can play every infield position
better than anybody on the Dodgers’ roster. Why trade Culbertson and not
only keep the aging Utley, but pay him double what they’d have to pay
Culbertson?
That’s as
inexplicable as starting Yu Darvish in the 7th game of the
World Series instead of Clayton Kershaw, universally acknowledged as the
best pitcher in baseball, and then bringing Kershaw into the game after
it was lost. But that’s the Dodgers.
|