Sports Medley: The
NFL’s Breast Cancer Month Callously Ignores Prostate Cancer 24 Oct 16
by Tony Medley
Every year the
National Football League has a “Breast Cancer Awareness Month.” And
every year the NFL ignores prostate cancer awareness. Why? The NFL is a
league of men. A majority of its fans are men. The players are men. The
team executives are men. The referees are predominantly men. Wouldn’t
one think that a billion-dollar organization like the NFL would be more
concerned about prostate cancer, which affects men 100%, than breast
cancer, in which less than 1% of the victims are men?
Other than skin cancer, prostate cancer
is the most common cancer in American men. The American Cancer Society’s
estimates for prostate cancer in the United States for 2016 are:
-
About 180,890
new cases of prostate cancer
-
About 26,120
deaths from prostate cancer
In 2013 (the most recent year numbers
are available)—
-
230,815 women
and 2,109 men in the United States were diagnosed with breast
cancer. 40,860 women and 464 men in the United States died from
breast cancer.
So what’s more
appropriate for the NFL, to devote a month to breast cancer, which
killed less than 500 men in 2013, or to devote a month to prostate
cancer, which is projected to kill 26, 210 men in 2016?
If the NFL has an
altruistic concern about cancer, then it should not limit its
“awareness” program to just one kind of cancer, it should promote cancer
“awareness” for all types of cancer. Or, promote cancer “awareness” for
both breast cancer and prostate cancer.
The NFL practices the
height of hypocrisy when it ignores prostate cancer awareness and spends
an entire month promoting breast cancer awareness. Frankly, it
infuriates me to see everyone in the NFL wearing pink for a month and
ignoring prostate cancer.
I’m not alone in
this. The NFL's pink campaign was severely criticized by Samantha King,
the author of Pink Ribbons, Inc. Breast Cancer and the Politics of
Philanthropy. King claims that the NFL was looking for ways to
rehabilitate its image because several of its players had had trouble
with the law, and it had discovered that women made up a meaningful part
of its audience, so the NFL was "interested in maintaining and extending
its female audience."
The NFL’s hypocrisy
in its concern for women is brought ever more clearly into focus when
one considers its shoddy lack of concern about domestic violence. One
could call the NFL a league of domestic violence, so many of its players
have been involved in abusing their women.
When one considers
that the league initially gave baby-faced Baltimore Ravens running back
Ray Rice only a two-game suspension for knocking his then girlfriend
unconscious, that allowed defensive stalwart Greg Hardy to return to
play for the Dallas Cowboys after almost killing his girlfriend, and
that it only gave New York Giants’ kicker Josh Brown a one-game
suspension for continuous violent abuse of his wife, and that those are
only three examples among a multitude that never reach the public’s eye,
you realize that the league’s concern for women’s health is piddling, if
not nonexistent.
Add to that the
number of players who father children willy-nilly with multiple women
not their wives and go off without any sense of responsibility (like
superstar Minnesota running back Adrian Peterson who is rumored to have
fathered five and maybe seven children out of wedlock all with different
women), one realizes that the NFL’s interest in women has nothing to do
with their well-being. In fact, the breast cancer awareness month is
nothing more than a cold-hearted PR stunt, full of sound and fury
signifying nothing, and the world should see it for what it is.
Why the Rams Lose,
vol. 1:
It seems as if the Rams’ favorite play on third down with five or more
yards to go for a first is to throw a short pass completed behind the
first down line and hope the receiver can run for the first down, which
they rarely do. Contrast this with New England and Pittsburgh where, in
similar situations, both Tom Brady and Ben Roethlisberger throw passes
that are completed beyond the first down line.
Bring back the
Replacement Refs:
The refereeing in the NFL gets worse and worse. Obvious pass
interference with Atlanta’s Julio Jones in the waning minutes of the
Charger game was not called, even though it happened right in front of
the ref. It would have put Atlanta in position for a game-winning field
goal, but they lost in overtime. These non-calls should be subject to
challenge.
|