Thumbnails Nov 22
by Tony Medley THE BANSHEES OF INISHERIN (8/10)
109 Minutes. R. Highlighted by
compelling performances by Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson and Kerry
Condon and beautiful cinematography of the bleak Irish countryside (the
film was shot on location on Inishmore and Achill Island on the west
coast of Ireland), this is a strange (and that’s putting it mildly),
almost dark John Ford-type, film with some comedy thrown in, about two
men in 1923 who once were friends and the violence that ensues, mostly
psychological. Back in the day this would be a prime awards candidate.
But it contains nothing woke that seem to be required in every New
Hollywood film. No, it’s just an All About Eve-type of film about
relationships with lots of talk, and I mean good talk. But because it
ain’t woke, probably forget about Oscar®. But it holds interest for
almost two hours.
Empire of Light (8/10): 119 minutes. R.
The story of a troubled woman working in
a large British movie theater in the ‘80s is surprisingly engrossing.
Olivia Coleman continues to prove that she is one of the best actresses
extant. She is buttressed by Michael Ward, who seems to me to be the new
Sidney Poitier, and Colin Firth as her lecherous boss. Written and
directed by Sam Mendes, this is a winner.
American Murderer (8/10): 101 minutes. R.
Written and directed by Matthew Gentile,
and “based on” the true story of Jason Derek Brown, this is a spot-on
presentation of a charming con man sociopath, disturbingly played by Tom
Pelphrey. Although Ryan Phillippe gives a wooden performance as an FBI
agent, the film is bolstered by a terrific short appearance by Jacki
Weaver as Jason’s mother.
Hunted (7/10): 94 minutes. R.
This is yet another film based on the
short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” written in 1924 by Richard
Connell and published in Collier’s Magazine. This is one of the
better treatments as four young hoodlums are captured by an extremely
wealthy British family and turned loose on their estate to be hunted
down. It is an entertaining treatment, full of tension.
THE RETURN OF TANYA
TUCKER FEATURING BRANDI CARLILE (7/10):
108 minutes. R.
I’m not sure why this is rated “R” unless
it is because there is smoking and some references to drugs. But it
should be PG-13, at the worst. Tucker was a beautiful, immensely
talented little girl, young woman, and grownup woman who lived a wild
life. She hadn’t recorded a song in 17 years when Grammy Award-winner
Brandi Carlile contacted her out of the blue to record a new album, and
this is that story. Carlile is a beautiful and talented
singer/songwriter, and their bonding is poignant, even though Carlile’s
constant cloying fawning attitude towards Tanya gets irritating. As it
is basically the story of making the album, the film only touches on
Tucker’s career in a few flashbacks, and virtually ignores her
controversial matching with 44-year-old Glen Campbell when she was
twenty-two, to its detriment. My main criticism, though, is a lack of
music. There is some, but not nearly enough.
The Ticket to
Paradise (4/10): 102 minutes.
PG-13. It’s a shame that such beautiful
scenery (supposed to be Bali but was filmed in Queensland, Australia) is
wasted on such a trifling, inept movie, despite a sterling performance
by Kaitlyn Dever, soon-to-be-married daughter of fighting divorced,
disapproving parents George Clooney and Julia Roberts, whose phony laugh
is still one of the most annoying things in Hollywood celluloid. This is
a fruitless attempt at a screwball comedy, but writer/director Ol Parker
is no Alan Dwan (1944’s Up in Mabel’s Room, 1945’s Getting
Gertie’s Garter, etc.) and Clooney is definitely no Dennis O’Keefe.
Stars at Noon (3/10):
135 minutes. R. What could have been a
tense thriller is greatly diminished by an ambiguous script that has
Margaret Qualley, who thinks she’s a journalist, and Joe Alwyn, a
mysterious businessman, being pursued in 1984 Nicaragua by, who? The
police? The army? One doesn’t know. Nor does one know why they are being
pursued. Worse, writer/director Claire Denis is hung up on huge face
shots of each of her protagonists. Scene after scene is filled with just
one face on screen. They are both attractive, but not that attractive.
How she could take well over two hours to tell whatever she’s trying to
tell is beyond me.
|