The Rhythm Section (4/10)
by Tony Medley
109 minutes.
R.
This is an action film made by the producers of the
James Bond franchise. This one is the origin story, purporting to create
a female James Bond, in the person of Stephanie Patrick (Blake Lively).
Directed by Reed Morano from a script by Mark
Burnell who has written a series of books with Patrick as the
protagonist (this film is based on the first book), the first half is
banal absurdity. Patrick’s family has died in an airplane crash and her
depression has reduced her to prostitution and penury. A news reporter (Raza
Jeffrey) approaches her with the news that the plane was brought down by
a bomber and who it was who placed the bomb on the plane, so she hits on
the idea of killing him.
That eventually puts her in touch with an unnamed
former MI-6 agent (Jude Law) who “trains” her to be an assassin.
The training is, frankly, beyond ludicrous. The
first hour of this film needs a lot of work to be believable. It’s not
enough for Law to treat her brutally in order to “toughen” her up. How
he treats her is inexplicable and to think that this treatment would
result in an expert assassin is just beyond the pale of reason. That
sets any thinking viewer on a negative plane about the film, at least it
did me.
When she finally gets on the track, however, the
action picks up and the film becomes better, but not more believable.
Nothing in the film makes any sense whatsoever, as it is just a
collection of set pieces with no segues and little relation to one
another. Just as an example, after dispatching some more bad guys, she
runs away through the city (I think it’s supposed to be Tangier),
running down one street after another to get away, which she finally
does and hops on a bus where she attacks a suicide bomber. Where did
that come from?
The questions are, is it worth sitting through the
first nonsensical hour for the last 49 minutes? And, is the last 49
minutes of nonstop action worth sitting through despite the fact that
the scenes are incoherent and full of flights of fancy? My assistant
thought so. I’m not convinced, even though there is a lot of
spine-tingling action.
James Bond films are mostly comedic, but at least
one scene leads into another and the segments are cohesive. In the
unlikely event that they make more of these they should spend some time
(any time would be an improvement) on structure and interrelations.
|