Knight and Day (7/10)
by Tony Medley
Run time 110 minutes
Not for children.
Tom Cruise joins Cameron
Diaz in director James Mangold’s attempt at an action comedy. Mangold
directed 2005’s Walk the Line, which minimized Johnny Cash’s
wonderful music, replaced his unique voice, and ignored his prolific
drug use, and 2007’s remake of 3:10 to Yuma. He says he wanted to
pattern this on two Cary Grant caper films, Stanley Donen’s, Charade
(1963) and Alfred Hitchock’s North by Northwest (1959).
Alas, both Charade
and North by Northwest made sense. There isn’t even one scene in
this film that could possibly occur in real life. But this isn’t real
life, it’s reel life, so it’s OK so long as it is as entertaining as
this is.
Even trying to tell the
plot would be a spoiler, so I’m not going to attempt it. Suffice it to
say that Diaz boards a plane and Cruise is a passenger. From then on,
her life spins like a roulette wheel, totally out of control. I thought
that the trailer made it look trite. Fortunately, I had to see it and
I’m glad I did. Had it been left to my opinion of the film based on the
trailer, I would have stayed far away.
Somebody told me that
Cruise claimed he did all the stunts himself. That’s about as believable
as the story about Obama being born in Hawaii. I can’t see Tom jumping
from the top of one speeding car onto the top of another speeding car,
or doing many of the other impossible stunts in the movie, and I
certainly can’t imagine an insurance company allowing him to do them.
Cruise and Diaz both give
sparkling, star-quality performances and bring the material to life,
despite its total lack of credibility, even though writer Patrick
O’Neil, who originated this as a spec script, has created a McGuffin of
which Hitchcock would be proud.
Mangold keeps the pace
moving and the mystery was confounding enough to hold my interest until
it’s revealed halfway through. The special effects, mostly involving
cars, were interesting, even if Tom was probably represented by a
double.
The exceptional talent of
Peter Sarsgaard is wasted in role that requires virtually nothing. Paul
Dano does a good job as Simon Feck, one of the more appropriately
onomatopoeic character’s names I’ve seen in quite a
while.
While who Tom is and why
he’s acting this way is presented in a captivating way, it is basically
his devil-may-care attitude, sparkling smile in the face of certain
destruction, and Diaz’s performance that make this worthwhile.
This is a lot of fun, but
leave your brain at home.
June 23, 2010
|