The Game
of their Lives (9/10)
by Tony Medley
Walter Bahr raised two sons,
Matt and Chris, both of whom became renowned place kickers in the NFL. But
that’s not Walter Bahr’s legacy. On June 19, 1950, he was one of the
leaders of a ragtag group of American soccer players who went up against
the best soccer team in the world, England, and beat them in the opening
round of the World Cup, soccer’s quadrennial World Series.
The story is even more amazing
because the team was picked only shortly before the World Cup was to begin
in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This film tells the story of how the players
were picked by Bill Jeffrey (John Rhys Davies), the ten days they had to
try to become a team, and then the trip to Rio and, finally, the game
itself against England and its star, Stan Mortenson (Gavin Rossdale, lead
singer/songwriter for the British rock group “bush,” making his motion
picture acting debut), considered the best player in the world at the
time.
Although most of the players
were recruited from in and around St. Louis, then the center of soccer
interest in the United States, Walter Bahr (Wes Bentley), a halfback from
Philadelphia emerged as the putative coach and leader of the team, even
though he’s challenged by loudmouth partyboy “Pee Wee” Wallace (Jay
Rodan). Bahr was astute enough to realize that the St. Louisians looked to
goalkeeper Frank Borghi (Gerard Butler, fresh from his starring role as
The Phantom in Andrew Lloyd Weber’s “The Phantom of the Opera”) as their
emotional leader, so he enlisted Borghi as sort of a co-leader. Bahr
induced Borghi to accompany him to recruit Joe Gaetjens (Jimmy
Jean-Louis), a Haitian-born kitchen worker, an inspirational player Bahr
was convinced would make the team competitive (and who scored the only
goal in the game). Jean-Louis adds spirit and lightness to the film with a
captivating performance.
Shot on a meager budget in 49
days, director David Anspaugh and screenwriter Angelo Pizzo (who
collaborated in 1986 on “Hoosiers,” the best basketball movie I’ve seen,
and 1993’s “Rudy”) ensured that the equipment used was the same equipment
that was extant in 1950, like soft leather soccer balls, some with laces.
They had to order 200 of them specially made from a manufacturer in
Pakistan. Costume designer Jane Anderson had a California manufacturer
create a heavy cotton knit that replicated the feeling of the period for
the uniforms and the socks.
The sequences of the actual
games are extraordinarily realistic, reminiscent of last year’s “Miracle,”
which is the best sports movie I’ve ever seen. It’s virtually impossible
to determine that what we are watching are staged scenes in a movie and
not clips from actual competition. As in “Miracle,” many of the actors are
real soccer players, which enhances the realism without resorting to
doubles.
My only complaint about the
movie is that it does nothing to explain the game of soccer. Maybe the
reason it doesn’t is that neither Pizzo nor Anspaugh was familiar with the
game, so they tell the story without ever explaining the theory or science
involved. I think for the film to be more meaningful to American
audiences, some effort should have been made to explain it. Surely there
must be more to the game of soccer than a bunch of people running up and
down the field trying to kick a round ball into a net. What’s the
difference between a full-back, a forward, a mid-fielder, and a half-back?
Inquiring minds would like to know and here was a terrific opportunity to
educate the vast masses of Americans who are mystified how soccer could be
the most popular sport in the world. But I walked out of the movie knowing
as little about the sport as I knew walking in.
An effort is made to make the
competition somewhat understandable by the BBC Announcer (Tim Vickery), as
he calls the game while we’re watching it. It’s an effective way to show
the playing of a game in a movie, rather than trying to show players
communicating with one another during the game, and Vickery is in the same
league as Vin Scully and Chick Hearn.
You don’t have to be a soccer
fan to like this movie; I’m not and I loved it.
March 31, 2005 |