Sin City
(1/10)
by Tony Medley
The 1970s British comedy group,
Monty Python, had a lot in common with other comedy groups, like Second
City and Saturday Night Live, in that most of their skits were silly and
unfunny, but a few were so good they became classics. One of the ones that
some people think of as a classic has John Cleese as a knight fighting
people who chop his limbs off one by one but he keeps fighting. Unlike
some people, I not only didn’t find it funny, I thought it bilious.
If you were one of those who
found that skit funny, then you might like “Sin City,” Director Robert
Rodriguez’s new descent into graphic violence without pain, masquerading
as stylistic filmmaking. If you’re like me, you will squirm and look at
your watch every few seconds for the entire two hour four minute running
time.
Unlike some, I wasn’t blown
away by Rodriguez’s stylism, which is vaguely derivative of Warren
Beatty’s “Dick Tracy” (1990). Just because Rodriguez films scenes in black
and white, adding a dash of color to his villains, like one who’s all in
black and white except her light blue eyes, and another who is all yellow,
doesn’t make this a wonderful film.
Rodriguez and his buddy in
graphic violence, Quentin Tarantino, have to take responsibility for how
the graphic, unemotional mayhem in their films desensitize the public to
violent behavior. When impressionable people see these films, and play the
video games that glorify violence in much the same way, bad things can
result. I don’t think it’s a stretch that the upsetting story of the 13
year-old who recently killed a 15 year-old friend by hitting him first in
the leg and then in the head with a baseball bat could have been
influenced by violent video games and movies like those produced by
Rodriguez and Tarantino.
I was told a back story of this
film that is more interesting than the film itself. It seems that
Rodriguez wanted to give Frank Miller, who wrote the script and upon whose
comic books for DC Comics (“Daredevil,” “Ronin,” and some “Batman”
stories) this thing is based, a credit as co-director. The Director’s
Guild (DGA) apparently demurred, maybe because Miller probably didn’t do
any directing and has never done any directing, or some silly reason like
that. This so infuriated Rodriguez that he resigned from the DGA and gave
Miller his credit, along with giving his buddy, Tarantino, a credit as
“guest director” whatever that is.
The only good thing about this
movie for me was the makeup that turned Mickey Rourke into an
unrecognizable Marv, who is a superman looking for the guys who killed his
one night stand girl friend, Roxie.
Oh, yeah, I shouldn’t fail to
mention that the movie promotes more anti-Catholicism in that one of the
villains is a Cardinal. That should win Rodriguez lots of plaudits with
secular Hollywood. It’s never a rabbi or a mullah or a minister. No, it’s
always a Catholic.
Because the story is a comic
book there’s no reason to go into the plot here in much detail. Hartigan
(Willis) is a cop in the corrupt, fictional Sin City. He saves a young
girl from rape by Roark Jr. (Nick Stahl). Marv is looking for the killers
of his prostitute. Then we meet Dwight (Clive Owen) who is a friend of all
the bad girls who run part of Sin City. Just about everybody gets shot and
worse but most end up none the worse for wear. People are horribly
tortured but apparently suffer no pain for it. The characters all come
together at the end after lots of bloody mayhem. Who cares? What a waste
of time!
April 16, 2005
|