Ice
Princess (5/10)
by Tony Medley
This is a mildly entertaining
flimsy trifle with a lousy premise. It missed a terrific opportunity to
present an accurate picture of women’s figure skating.
Casey Carlyle (Michelle
Trachtenberg) is a high school physics whiz whose mother, Joan (Joan
Cusack) has on the fast track to a Harvard scholarship. Gen Harwood
(Hayden Panettiere) is a popular classmate who views Casey with disdain.
Gen is also a figure skater who is being coached by her mother, Tina (Kim
Cattrall) to be a champion. But Gen isn’t thrilled because her mother is
such an ogre that Gen doesn’t have time for her boy friend. Casey has to
make a “personal” physics report for her Harvard application, so she
decides to do it on the physics involved in ice skating. This brings her
in contact with Tina and skating, which has been a beloved hobby of hers
up until now.
That sets the stage for what
could have been a good analysis of the competitive world of women’s figure
skating. Alas, although the film is entertaining, and will probably be
loved by little girls, it completely misses the point, as well has being
logically inconsistent.
It starts off with a view of
Casey skating on her pond, doing a lot of the moves we see champions
doing. But later when she signs up for a lesson for novices with Tina, she
doesn’t seem to be able to do the things we saw under the opening titles.
But she prevails and enters competition for some kind of regional
championship, competing against girls who have been training all their
lives, including Gen. We are asked to believe that Casey can perfect such
difficult moves as a double axel and a double lutz after just a few weeks
of novice lessons, moves that all figure skaters train for a decade, seven
days a week, to perfect, but Casey does them after only a few weeks
training.
This film really dropped the
ball in exposing what female figure skaters have to go through to arrive
at the big time. Except for Tina, there’s very little of the dominating
parents and how they rob their children of their childhood in pursuit of
the dream.
But the worst part of this film
is its premise. It has Casey forego a promising career as a physicist
with a Harvard education for a chance at competing on the ice, which has
virtually no future at all. For every Michelle Kwan and Dorothy Hamill
there are thousands of young women who skate and then have nothing
substantial in terms of a career to show for the endless hours of
training. The premise of this film, that a teenager should go for her
dream of ice skating and turn her back on her obvious promise as a
talented physicist, is irresponsible, influencing, as it will, the
impressionable young girls who will see it. There was no reason why Disney should
show Casey as a talented physicist to bring this story to the screen.
Momma Joan puts the icing on the cake by giving her imprimatur to Casey’s
decision.
Although Trachtenberg and
Panettiere were doubled in most of the skating scenes that called for
acrobatic jumps, the other three competitors who appear in the film,
Nikki, aka the “little shrimp," the spunky Zoey, and Tiffany, the hard
edged rival of everyone, are played by real life skaters, 12-year old
Kirsten Olson, 2004 Intermediate Ladies Minnesota State Champion,
14-year-old Juliana Cannarozzo, a first-place winner in the 2003 North
American Championships, and Jocelyn Lai, an accomplished competitive
skater and professional dancer respectively.
I enjoyed the movie, even
though I deplored the premise. I also wasn’t thrilled with the original,
commonplace music
to which the skaters skated. When we watch ice skating we generally see it
with familiar, catchy music that adds immeasurably to the enjoyment of the
skating. Worse was the cinematography which doesn't capture the beauty,
speed, or athleticism of ice skating. The
film could have used more skating, but only if the producers could have
found someone who could film it properly and someone else who could
provide the captivating music we generally hear when we watch skating on
television.
March 19, 2005 |