Elizabethtown (1/10)
by Tony Medley
When you check in to a romantic
comedy and learn that it’s more than two hours long, you know you’re in
for an excruciating experience, probably with a guy directing his own
script. Sure enough, directing this stinker is Cameron Crowe directing
Cameron Crowe’s script, produced by Cameron Crowe (along with his buddy
Tom Cruise).
The problems are many; words
without meaning, characters without purpose, a film without a premise.
Orlando Bloom finally got a role for which he was born, a short, skinny
wimp, instead of the superhero warriors he laughably played in two other
stinkers, “Troy” (2004) and “Kingdom of Heaven” (2005). He’s teamed with
Kirsten Dunst who goes through the entire movie with an enigmatic smile on
her face, as if she knows something nobody else knows. But I know what it
is. She knows she’s being paid a lot of money acting in a bomb, laughing
all the way to the bank.
The apparent story (hey, it’s
so long and disjointed that to call this a story is a stretch) is that
Drew Baylor (Bloom) is sent by his mother, Hollie Baylor (Susan Sarandon)
and family, back to a small town called Elizabethtown to bring back his
deceased father. Who died, that’s why he’s deceased. On the plane back he
is apparently the only passenger so for some unknown reason he’s hit on by
an obnoxious stewardess, Claire Colburn (Dunst). From that shaky start it
just gets worse and longer. Sitting through this movie gives one an
impression of how long eternity might be.
Rarely will you ever see a
romantic duo with less chemistry than Bloom and Dunst. Maybe the big smile
Kirsten has on her face after their scenes together is that the kissing is
finally over and she can go home for the day.
There’s good news and bad news
about Sarandon. The good news is that for the first time in several
mediocre movies, she doesn’t flash her breasts, about which she is so
proud. Apparently someone got her the word that 50-year-old breasts aren’t
the same as 20-year-old breasts in the sex appeal department. The bad news
is that she takes the stage at the end of the movie for a tawdry monologue
in extremely poor taste, which she concludes with a tap dance, that she
learned in the, what, three days since her hubby died. Don’t ask why she
would be doing this. If you’re smart you’ll never find out, nor will you
have to watch this deplorable dance. Flashing her breasts is a better
idea.
The fact that she’s onstage at
this shindig for her hubby is just one of the many plot points that defy
credulity. One of the others is that when Drew is coming back home with
his old man’s ashes (after we watch the old man be buried; explain that!)
he is following an itinerary drawn up by Hollie that would have taken a
real person at least a year to devise, so labyrinthine and organized is
it. So many questions rush to the mind after surviving this two hour
ordeal, to wit: Why would Hollie do this? When did she have the time? Why
is Drew driving across country when he flew back to pick up the old man?
Can one new sneaker really cost a company $1 billion? How could anyone
have read this script and agreed to finance this movie?
October 10, 2005 |