| 
		Sports Medley: 
		Defense? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Defense! 5 Feb 18 
		by Tony Medley 
		In a game that saw 
		more than 1000 yards gained by both teams, New England Patriots coach 
		Bill Belichick signaled before the opening kickoff how little value he 
		gave to his team’s defense by benching probably his best defensive back, 
		Malcolm Butler. You remember Malcolm Butler, of course. He was a rookie 
		defensive back who won the Super Bowl for New England three 
		years ago by making an improbable interception on the stupidest play 
		call in the history of professional football, a pass called by Seattle 
		coach Pete Carroll when Seattle had a first and goal on the 1 yard line 
		with less than a minute left to play. 
		With typical 
		Belichick nonspeak, Coach Bill explained, “we did what we felt was best 
		for the team.” 
		Even so, Philadelphia 
		had to recover from several momentum changing gaffes to prevail. 
		Gaffe #1: Quarterback 
		Nick Foles took the opening kickoff and drove his team down to a second 
		and goal on New England’s 3 yard line. It was at this point that star 
		tight end Zach Ertz was called for illegal motion. Philly couldn’t 
		convert so was limited to a field goal. 
		Gaffe  #2: After New 
		England drove down and tied the score with its own field-goal, Foles 
		threw a perfect touchdown pass to Alshon Jeffrey. But Philly then missed 
		the conversion. 
		So after playing a 
		brilliant first quarter, Philly was only up by six points and it looked 
		as if New England had momentum. 
		But these gaffes soon 
		proved to be illusory as neither team played defense. Actually New 
		England put a lot more pressure on Foles than Philly put on Patriots’ 
		quarterback Tom Brady. This resulted in Brady throwing for a Super Bowl 
		record of more than 500 yards as Philly simply had no pass defense; 
		Patriots receivers were often wide open with no defenders in sight. 
		While New England’s 
		defensive secondary was equally inept, the Patriots’ four-man rush often 
		pressured Foles; certainly a lot more than Philly’s four-man rush 
		pressured Brady. There was only one sack in the entire game. Even so, 
		Foles, eschewing the pressure, threw several pinpoint long passes. 
		What’s a Catch? 
		This is a question that has been bugging the league for years and there 
		was certainly no definitive solution by the officials in this game. 
		Catch #1: In the 
		third quarter Foles threw a 22 yard touchdown pass to Cory Clement. 
		Clement caught the ball at the back of the end zone but the ball moved 
		just as his foot hit the end line going out of bounds. During the 
		regular season this would have been called an incomplete pass 100% of 
		the time. But after a review the officials upheld it. This raises the 
		question of propriety of ignoring a rule just because it’s the Super 
		Bowl. 
		Catch #2: with 2:21 
		left in the game and trailing by one point Foles threw an 11 yard pass 
		to Ertz who caught it with both hands on the 5 yard line, took three 
		steps and dove into the end zone holding the ball out in front of him 
		with two hands. When the ball hit the ground in the end zone it popped 
		up in the air and Ertz caught it. While this went into replay because it 
		was a scoring play, the two TV announcers, Chris Collinsworth and Al 
		Michaels, both indicated that they thought it was going to be ruled an 
		incomplete pass. That was absurd. Ertz caught the ball and took three 
		steps before he dove into the end zone. He was clearly a runner 
		stretching the ball over the goal line; it wasn’t even close. And that’s 
		the way it was upheld. 
		But there is no doubt 
		that under present NFL rules and the way they have been interpreted all 
		year long, the touchdown by Clement should have been disallowed. It does 
		raise the troubling question of the propriety of changing the 
		interpretation of a rule just because it’s the Super Bowl. 
		Combined with the 
		trade two months ago of blossoming star quarterback Jimmy Garapollo, 
		apparently a trade ordered by owner Robert Kraft in response to a Brady 
		request and over Belichick’s strenuous objections, the benching and 
		probable departure of their star defensive back, who becomes an 
		unrestricted free agent, along with rumored retirements of people like 
		tight end Rob Gronkowski, make the Patriots’ future less than rosy. 
		There is also 
		apparently a rumor floating around that Brady might retire. If he did 
		lobby for the trade of Garapollo because Jimmy was a threat to Brady’s 
		starting quarterback position, it would be the ultimate offense to his 
		team and his fans if, having gotten rid of his competition, he were to 
		hang up his cleats, leaving the Patriots high and dry without a 
		replacement quarterback. 
		Here’s a thought. If 
		Brady and Belichick were on opposite sides of the Garapollo departure 
		and Belichick obviously lost that one, maybe Bill will retire. 
		  |