Sports Medley: March
Madness Nonsense 12 Mar 18
by Tony Medley
The NCAA is so
damaging to college athletics that a list of its misdeeds would take a
large book. While its primary function seems to be to exploit college
basketball and football players to make as much money out of them as
colleges can without equivalent compensation, March Madness is a close
second. It completely eviscerates the reason for a regular season,
making the games meaningless over and above who won each particular
game. Those games have no meaning in the grand scheme of things.
In the old days you
had to win your conference to qualify for the NCAA Championship
tournament. No more.
A glaring example of
the absurdity of choosing who makes the cut to participate in March
Madness is Oklahoma. Even though the Sooners lost 11 of their final 15
games, they qualified. Oklahoma State (19-14), on the other hand, beat
Oklahoma (18-13) twice(!) and also beat Kansas twice(!) but both
Oklahoma and Kansas are in March Madness while Oklahoma State was
rejected.
This type of inequity
abounds all because 36 of the teams are chosen subjectively, often
based on something called RPI (Ratings Percentage Index), which rates
teams based on three factors; winning percentage (25%), opponents’
winning percentage (50%), and the opponents’ opponents’ winning
percentage (25%). Head to head matchups mean absolutely nothing. Bad as
March Madness is, this method of choosing the teams that qualify is
nothing less than madness itself.
Even the conference
seasons are meaningless because conference winners are not guaranteed
admission into March Madness. A team has to win its conference
tournament to get an automatic qualification.
As a result of all
this, since all the games played before the conference tournaments are
virtually meaningless in terms of the pot of gold at the end of the
rainbow, winning the NCAA Championship, what’s the point of playing
them. More to the point, why would anybody pay good money to watch them,
apart from some esoteric interest in watching exceptional athletes
perform?
More Walton Wisdom:
Speaking about UCLA player Jalen Hands, who had just scored and been
removed from the game against Arizona, TV Commentator Bill Walton said,
“You want to be so hungry on that bench. You want to be over there on
that bench elbowing the coach, ‘Hey, Lemme in there! Lemme in there!’
And if he ignores you long enough, just walk in there; substitute
yourself. Make a play the first time you touch the ball. And then the
coach will say, ‘Yeah, I made a great substitution there,’ in the
postgame press conference.”
Really? Walton played
for John Wooden. Wooden had a rule that a player’s hair couldn’t be
longer than two inches and he didn’t allow facial hair. When Walton
showed up for a new season with long hair and a beard, Wooden told him
to cut them both. Walton said he had been Player of the Year on a
National Championship team that went undefeated and that Wooden didn’t
have the right to tell him that. Wooden responded, “You’re correct,
Bill. I don’t have that right. I just have the right to determine who’s
going to play and we’re going to miss you. In about 15 minutes we’re not
going to have you unless you go upstairs and have that hair taken care
of.”
Walton ran out,
jumped on his bike and rode directly down to Westwood and told the
barber to “cut it all off.” He then raced back to Pauley Pavilion and
“dumped my bike outside of Pauley and stood in line and just hoped he
didn’t notice I had missed the first five minutes of practice.”
So, considering how
Walton caved when challenged by a coach, why does he lecture such
nonsense about disrespecting coaches to a national TV audience?
|