Sports Medley Week of 30 October 2014
by Tony Medley
Wrong Garden, Wrong Team, but, hey, it’s the same sport:
ESPN’s 30 for 30 presented a documentary, When the Garden was
Eden, about the New York Knicks of the early ‘70s. Right at the
beginning Marv Albert talks about college basketball in the Holiday
Tournament and the NIT played in Madison Square Garden over unidentified
films of a basketball game, clearly implying it was a game at Madison
Square Garden from one of those two tournaments. The problem is that
it’s a film clip of the Gail Goodrich-Keith Erickson UCLA team of
1964-65. UCLA did play in a holiday tournament that year, but it was in
Los Angeles at the Sports Arena and, in fact, that UCLA team never
played in Madison Square Garden. Wouldn’t you think that ESPN, of all
stations, could find a clip from a 1960’s-70’s era game that was
actually played in the Garden, not from a game played 3,000 miles away,
to put in its documentary about a New York basketball team playing in
the titular Garden? Oh, well, I guess the suits think that basketball is
basketball, who cares who’s playing, and, anyway, who is going to look
at the clip that closely to realize that the clip had about as much
relevance to the subject of the show as Marilyn Monroe has to the
Declaration of Independence? But, let’s face it, this is sloppy, lazy,
unacceptable, and robs the film of verisimilitude.
Never listen to talking heads:
On ESPN’s pre-Sunday game show before NFL games for week 2, the panel
consisted of Coach Mike Ditka, Cris Carter, Ray Lewis, Keyshawn Johnson,
and Tom Jackson. Johnson opined categorically that the Dallas Cowboys
were the worst team in football, and the entire panel agreed. Since then
Dallas ran off six wins in a row to lead its Division. To its credit,
ESPN brought the subject up after the 6th week and gave
Johnson and the panel the opportunity to talk about it and explain. The
ensuing blather did nothing to contradict the idea that none of these
guys know their elbow from third base.
Dumb or Arrogant or both:
Last year’s best team, Seattle, dumped its leading receiver, Golden Tate
(now sparkling for Detroit), in the off season, apparently intending to
rely on high-salaried wide receiver Percy Harvin, for whom they traded
in March of 2013 but who was injured most of last year, for this year.
Then Harvin apparently proved so poisonous in the locker room that last
week he was given away to the New York Jets for a conditional sixth
round draft choice, leaving Seattle without a prime receiver, which
helps explain the Seahawks’ dismal performance to date (for a defending
Super Bowl Champion).
Bring Back the Replacement Refs:
It’s not the NFL anymore; it’s the NPL, National Penalty League. Here’s
a comparison of major penalties last year vs. this year through week 7:
Penalty
2013 2014
Illegal Contact 23 67
Defensive Holding 94 172
Offensive Pass Interference 43 56
Illegal Use of Hands 23 67
Total 183 362
This proliferation of penalties is ruining the game. Referees should not
decide the game, but their explosion of throwing flags is becoming more
decisive than a good quarterback or defensive secondary. Fans pay to see
guys like Aaron Rogers, Peyton Manning, and Drew Brees throw passes, not
a bunch of old geezers in striped shirts throw flags. Let them play!
Rules Change Recommendation:
In the Detroit Lions-Atlanta Falcons game in London on October 26, there
was a defensive pass interference call against the Lions on a Falcons’
pass. The pass was intercepted by Detroit and on the runback of the
interception Atlanta was called for a penalty. The result was that that
penalty against the Falcons offset the pass interference penalty against
the Lions, and the down was replayed. When there is pass interference,
the ruling is that the pass is deemed completed at the spot of the foul.
So, had there been no pass interference, the subsequent penalty would
never have occurred. The rule should be changed so that if the
subsequent penalty would not have occurred but for the prior penalty,
the prior penalty should take precedence. To offset them and replay the
down rewards the team committing the pass interference. Further, there
is logic and precedent for this position because the rule itself says
that the intercepted pass is null and void because of pass interference.
If so, everything that happens subsequently, including another penalty,
should be null and void, or should, at the very least, have no effect on
the pass interference penalty. |