Lincoln (0/10)
by Tony Medley
Run time 140
minutes.
OK for children.
When
you see a movie purporting to be an historical drama, it's vitally
important that its verisimilitude is established at the outset.
Director Steven Spielberg and writer Tony Kushner start this movie with
an opening scene that is so contrived and so contrary to fact that the
film's credibility is forever tarnished.
After
the opening battle scenes, Lincoln (Daniel Day-Lewis) is sitting on a
tree stump somewhere on a battlefield in early 1865. Four soldiers, two
white and two black, are speaking with him (that, in itself, is enough
to make one wonder; that the President of the United States would find
himself alone, sitting on a tree stump, speaking with four soldiers).
Suddenly all four soldiers start to recite the Gettysburg Address
verbatim. Gabor Boritt, the author of The
Gettysburg Gospel: The Lincoln Speech That Nobody Knows,
claims that between 1863, when it was delivered, and 1876, the nation's
Centennial year, the Gettysburg Address was "the speech that nobody
knew," and that it had no great popularity after it was delivered or
even in the wake of Lincoln's assassination. So for Spielberg to have
four soldiers adoringly recite it word for word to Lincoln himself in
January of 1865, less than two years after Lincoln delivered it, is
counter-factual at least, if not ridiculous.
The
movie moves downhill from there. It is wordy, but the words are, as
Shakespeare might have said, in accents yet unknown. Kushner candidly
admits, "we know that these events occurred but we don't know very much
about what was said, so that gave me a certain amount of license and I
was glad to have it." In other words, he made it up. Unfortunately, what
license he took is not credible. Nobody spoke like these people speak,
especially Lincoln. It's like he's speaking in blank verse sometimes, or
for posterity. Lincoln, in fact, was a regular guy who told lots of
jokes. The jokes here look like they have halos around them.
The
movie is trying to tell the story of how the 13th Amendment to the
Constitution, prohibiting slavery, was enacted. But in the way it's
told, the machinations all the characters go through are almost
incomprehensible. This film constantly reminded me of Hamlet's response
to Polonius, when Polonius asks, "What are you reading, my lord?" Hamlet
replies, "Words, words, words."
Then,
when the 13th Amendment is finally up for passage, Spielberg goes
through the calling of the role of the entire House of Representatives
(by state, since each state gets one vote) and this ponderous scene
makes one yearn to watch grass grow. Worse, you won't see a better
example of overacting anywhere than by the people doing the voting.
Astonishingly, when it's finally passed, the entire House of
Representatives breaks out in song, almost a production number as if
this were a Gene Kelly or Fred Astaire musical.
As an
historical aside having nothing to do with the movie (and not mentioned
in the movie despite the incredible number of words used), the first 12
Amendments were passed within 15 years of the enactment of the
Constitution. Two amendments had been proposed as the 13th, one of
which, The Corwin Amendment, passed both houses of Congress and was
signed by President James Buchanan on his last day of office in 1861,
the day Lincoln became President. It would have forbidden the adoption
of any Constitutional Amendment that would have abolished or restricted
slavery, or permitted the Congress to do so (the very thing that the
real 13th Amendment actually did). Lincoln, in his first inaugural
address referred to The Corwin Amendment and said, "I understand a
proposed amendment to the Constitution . . . has passed Congress, to the
effect that the Federal Government shall never interfere with the
domestic institutions of the States, including that of persons held to
service. I have no objection to its being made express and irrevocable."
The purpose of The Corwin Amendment was to persuade the south not to
secede from the Union. It was passed by only three states and was
obviously unsuccessful.
Finally
there is the pace of the film. I don't know what has happened to
Spielberg because when he was a young man, pace was his specialty. His
first film, Duel (1971), basically contained only one character,
Dennis Weaver, battling a truck. The pace was intense. Similarly, he
followed up with Jaws (1975) and the Indiana Jones trilogy, which
were defined by terrific pace. On the contrary, this film is devoid of
pace. It drags on and on and on, without credibility or cohesion.
Forget all the adulatory plaudits you might read, this could be the most
boring movie ever made.
|