Lions for Lambs (3/10)
by Tony Medley
I’m not sure why
Producer-director Robert Redford and writer Matthew Carnahan thought
this was cinematic, but they were wrong. Most of this is college
professor Redford trying to convince potential-filled but mediocre
student Todd Hayes (Andrew Garfield) to become more involved. Well, OK,
but is this a movie? If I want a civics lesson, I’ll enroll in high
school.
But what about the B story
(or is it the A story or the C story?) in which pro-Iraq war Senator
Jaspar Irving (Tom Cruise) tries to enlist the support of TV reporter
Janine Roth (Meryl Streep), who is a typical leftwing journalist. They
go back and forth about the war. But this is the same kind of stuff you
see on Fox News and CNN every hour of every day. Do you want to pay $10
to see it on the big screen?
Two of Redford’s former
students, Michael Peña and Derek Luke are soldiers shot down in the war
zone, fighting for their lives. One would think that maybe two men
fighting for their lives in the middle of a war would spell action, but
a hint of action was too much for Redford and Carnahan. Believe it or
not, these guys spend most of the time contemplating the meaning of life
while surrounded by the medieval enemy trying to kill them.
I’ve got to give it to
Redford, though, because it’s really not a leftwing screed. Both sides
of the issues are presented. Irving presents the Administration position
pretty well. He’s counterbalanced by the cynical Roth, who isn’t having
any of it. The positions are presented in such a way that each side is
adequately represented.
The main problem with the
film is that it is a real snorer. There’s no real plot. No one is a true
protagonist. There isn’t a bad guy. There’s no story. If you’re troubled
by insomnia, buying this DVD and putting it on every night when you go
to bed might be a great cure.
|