| 
		 
		  
		Thumbnails Apr 18 
		
		by Tony Medley 
		
		Journey’s End (9/10): 
		Based on a 1928 play by RC Sherriff this captures the ghastliness and 
		bleak despair felt by the soldiers in the trenches of World War I. In 
		1918 alone more than 1,700,000 combatants were killed. For the entire 
		war (4+ years) about 10% of all fighting soldiers were killed. This 
		compares with 4.5% in World War II. The total proportion of troops who 
		became casualties (killed or wounded) was a staggering 56%. This is a 
		brilliant exposition of what life was like in the trenches and the 
		futility of even trying to hope. The combat scenes are so vivid it’s 
		hard to believe anyone could survive.  For an indie it has an 
		exceptionally fine cast which includes Sam Claflin, Asa Butterfield, 
		Paul Bettany, Toby Jones and Tom Sturridge. The only movie with which I 
		can compare it is Stanley Kubrick’s Paths of Glory (1957), but 
		that film doesn’t have the outstanding lifelike battle scenes of this 
		one.  
		
		Gringo (9/10): 
		A throwback to the old days, a good screwball comedy updated to include 
		X-rated language. In fact, star Charlize Thereon said, “When I played 
		Elaine, things came out of her mouth that I never imagined would come 
		out of my mouth. There were a lot of moments during the making of this 
		film where I was completely red in the face and kind of looking at my 
		crew going, ‘Guys, I’m really sorry for saying all this stuff’.” 
		
		Shot in Chicago, 
		Mexico City, and Veracruz, Mexico, this film combines action with comedy 
		and fine pace. Unlike many new movies, it celebrates color and light, a 
		pleasure to watch. 
		
		Tomb Raider (7/10):
		 Raiders 
		of the lost Ark (1981) on steroids, instead of Harrison Ford running 
		and chasing and being chased all the time, this time it’s Alicia 
		Vikander. She’s a lot easier to look at for almost two hours than 
		Harrison, at least for men she is. While the tale has little cohesion, 
		it’s a far, far better film than last year’s silly Wonder Woman. 
		Basically, it’s another exciting, entertaining film for which you must 
		follow The Beatles’ suggestion and simply “turn off your mind, relax and 
		float downstream…” 
		
		The Death of Stalin (6/10): 
		It’s too bad that this is played for 
		laughs, showing Stalin’s associates as akin to Keystone Kops completely 
		discombobulated by his death, because it would have made a terrific 
		serious movie filled with intrigue and tension. While it gets some 
		things right, like the fate of NKVD Chief Lavrenti Beria, the movie just 
		accepts the story that the monster Stalin (who killed more people than 
		Hitler, including murdering his closest associates) died of a stroke and 
		never raises the possibility that he was assassinated by his comrades 
		(as he probably assassinated Lenin). Satire or farce, it completely 
		missed the mark for me.  
		
		Final Portrait 
		(2/10): I 
		was expecting something along the lines of “My Dinner with Andre” 
		(1981), but this is nothing as stimulating as that. Writer-director 
		Stanley Tucci must have wanted to capture the tedium involved in sitting 
		for a portrait for a famous artist. So he created a movie as tedious to 
		sit through as it was for James Lord to sit for a painting in 1964 for 
		the artist Alberto Giacometti (a painting that eventually sold for $20 
		million). 
		
		The Young Karl Marx Le Jeune Karl 
		Marx (2/10): Director and 
		cowriter Raoul (I Am Not Your Negro) Peck created this tale using 
		the actual correspondence among the people involved including voluminous 
		letters between youthful Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels themselves. It 
		should have been a fascinating story about them as young, vibrant men 
		between the years 1843-50 sans the long Herman Melville-type beards with 
		which they are always pictured. Unfortunately, what Peck has produced is 
		slow and disappointingly uninvolving.  
		
		
		  
		
		  
		
		   |