Thumbnails Apr 18
by Tony Medley
Journey’s End (9/10):
Based on a 1928 play by RC Sherriff this captures the ghastliness and
bleak despair felt by the soldiers in the trenches of World War I. In
1918 alone more than 1,700,000 combatants were killed. For the entire
war (4+ years) about 10% of all fighting soldiers were killed. This
compares with 4.5% in World War II. The total proportion of troops who
became casualties (killed or wounded) was a staggering 56%. This is a
brilliant exposition of what life was like in the trenches and the
futility of even trying to hope. The combat scenes are so vivid it’s
hard to believe anyone could survive. For an indie it has an
exceptionally fine cast which includes Sam Claflin, Asa Butterfield,
Paul Bettany, Toby Jones and Tom Sturridge. The only movie with which I
can compare it is Stanley Kubrick’s Paths of Glory (1957), but
that film doesn’t have the outstanding lifelike battle scenes of this
one.
Gringo (9/10):
A throwback to the old days, a good screwball comedy updated to include
X-rated language. In fact, star Charlize Thereon said, “When I played
Elaine, things came out of her mouth that I never imagined would come
out of my mouth. There were a lot of moments during the making of this
film where I was completely red in the face and kind of looking at my
crew going, ‘Guys, I’m really sorry for saying all this stuff’.”
Shot in Chicago,
Mexico City, and Veracruz, Mexico, this film combines action with comedy
and fine pace. Unlike many new movies, it celebrates color and light, a
pleasure to watch.
Tomb Raider (7/10):
Raiders
of the lost Ark (1981) on steroids, instead of Harrison Ford running
and chasing and being chased all the time, this time it’s Alicia
Vikander. She’s a lot easier to look at for almost two hours than
Harrison, at least for men she is. While the tale has little cohesion,
it’s a far, far better film than last year’s silly Wonder Woman.
Basically, it’s another exciting, entertaining film for which you must
follow The Beatles’ suggestion and simply “turn off your mind, relax and
float downstream…”
The Death of Stalin (6/10):
It’s too bad that this is played for
laughs, showing Stalin’s associates as akin to Keystone Kops completely
discombobulated by his death, because it would have made a terrific
serious movie filled with intrigue and tension. While it gets some
things right, like the fate of NKVD Chief Lavrenti Beria, the movie just
accepts the story that the monster Stalin (who killed more people than
Hitler, including murdering his closest associates) died of a stroke and
never raises the possibility that he was assassinated by his comrades
(as he probably assassinated Lenin). Satire or farce, it completely
missed the mark for me.
Final Portrait
(2/10): I
was expecting something along the lines of “My Dinner with Andre”
(1981), but this is nothing as stimulating as that. Writer-director
Stanley Tucci must have wanted to capture the tedium involved in sitting
for a portrait for a famous artist. So he created a movie as tedious to
sit through as it was for James Lord to sit for a painting in 1964 for
the artist Alberto Giacometti (a painting that eventually sold for $20
million).
The Young Karl Marx Le Jeune Karl
Marx (2/10): Director and
cowriter Raoul (I Am Not Your Negro) Peck created this tale using
the actual correspondence among the people involved including voluminous
letters between youthful Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels themselves. It
should have been a fascinating story about them as young, vibrant men
between the years 1843-50 sans the long Herman Melville-type beards with
which they are always pictured. Unfortunately, what Peck has produced is
slow and disappointingly uninvolving.
|