The Leisure Seeker
(6/10)
by Tony Medley
Runtime 112 minutes.
R
I went to see this
because of Helen Mirren. No matter how bad the movie, she generally
makes it worthwhile. It’s Italian made, directed by Paolo Virzì, who
also has a writing credit with a bunch of people named Stephen Amidon,
Francesca Archibugi, and Francesco Piccolo, from a
short novel by Michael Zadoorian about an
elderly couple running away from
the Detroit suburbs to California in their old RV, along the iconic
Route 66. The
problem is that Paolo apparently didn’t have an editor who had the guts
to cut the thing down to a workable viewing experience. I’m often
grousing about films that run too long and this is the perfect case in
point. It goes on and on and on, failing the watch test dismally.
Paolo used
Zadoorian’s idea but changed it so that Mirren and her husband, Donald
Sutherland, take off from Boston on a trip to the Florida Keys to view
Ernest Hemingway’s house in Key West. Donald was a college professor
with a specialty in Hemingway’s writing. Now, alas, he’s suffering from
dementia. Helen also has an unnamed malady that we don’t learn what it
is until the end of the movie. They take off without the knowledge or
consent of their children (Christian McKay and Janel Moloney) in an old
RV named, The Leisure Seeker, what else?
While their children
worry about their parents since they don’t know where they are, Helen
and Donald traipse down the east coast having one adventure after
another and this is where the film loses its way. Paolo should have cut
their adventures short; there are just too many of them and they are too
predictable to not have been seen as disposable.
Mirren shines, as
usual, and Sutherland handles a difficult role with aplomb. It does
present the difficulties of one spouse lovingly dealing with the other
who has constant memory failures that can’t help but be annoying.
This is a wonderfully realistic presentation of this problem that is
becoming more and more common.
It closes with what
appears to be a political pitch for a controversial action that would be
a terminal spoiler if I wrote about it, so I won’t.
This could have been
a terrific movie had it been more tightly directed and edited down to 90
minutes, and if it had left out the preachy ending, which clearly takes
a position instead of leaving it up to the viewer to decide.
|