| 
		 
		  
		The Leisure Seeker 
		(6/10) 
		
		by Tony Medley 
		
		Runtime 112 minutes. 
		
		R 
		
		I went to see this 
		because of Helen Mirren. No matter how bad the movie, she generally 
		makes it worthwhile. It’s Italian made, directed by Paolo Virzì, who 
		also has a writing credit with a bunch of people named Stephen Amidon, 
		Francesca Archibugi, and Francesco Piccolo, from a
		short novel by Michael Zadoorian about an 
		elderly couple running away from 
		
		the Detroit suburbs to California in their old RV, along the iconic 
		Route 66. The 
		problem is that Paolo apparently didn’t have an editor who had the guts 
		to cut the thing down to a workable viewing experience. I’m often 
		grousing about films that run too long and this is the perfect case in 
		point. It goes on and on and on, failing the watch test dismally. 
		
		Paolo used 
		Zadoorian’s idea but changed it so that Mirren and her husband, Donald 
		Sutherland, take off from Boston on a trip to the Florida Keys to view 
		Ernest Hemingway’s house in Key West. Donald was a college professor 
		with a specialty in Hemingway’s writing. Now, alas, he’s suffering from 
		dementia. Helen also has an unnamed malady that we don’t learn what it 
		is until the end of the movie. They take off without the knowledge or 
		consent of their children (Christian McKay and Janel Moloney) in an old 
		RV named, The Leisure Seeker, what else? 
		
		While their children 
		worry about their parents since they don’t know where they are, Helen 
		and Donald traipse down the east coast having one adventure after 
		another and this is where the film loses its way. Paolo should have cut 
		their adventures short; there are just too many of them and they are too 
		predictable to not have been seen as disposable. 
		
		Mirren shines, as 
		usual, and Sutherland handles a difficult role with aplomb. It does 
		present the difficulties of one spouse lovingly dealing with the other 
		who has constant memory failures that can’t help but be annoying. 
		This is a wonderfully realistic presentation of this problem that is 
		becoming more and more common.  
		
		It closes with what 
		appears to be a political pitch for a controversial action that would be 
		a terminal spoiler if I wrote about it, so I won’t. 
		
		This could have been 
		a terrific movie had it been more tightly directed and edited down to 90 
		minutes, and if it had left out the preachy ending, which clearly takes 
		a position instead of leaving it up to the viewer to decide. 
		
		   |